tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22031270.post518483729336026887..comments2023-11-03T19:05:08.512+11:00Comments on Harry Clarke: Carbon Pollution Reduction SchemeUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22031270.post-49862838001138724072008-09-16T15:09:00.000+10:002008-09-16T15:09:00.000+10:00I like this submission by Kerjman having already w...I like this submission by Kerjman having already written below here:<BR/>http://www.climatechange.gov.au/greenpaper/consultation/pubs/0020-kerjman.pdf <BR/><BR/>Really what is good in air trading but following one's profit only?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22031270.post-87833600905769383782008-07-29T22:47:00.000+10:002008-07-29T22:47:00.000+10:00Starting now, you have all the information, data a...Starting now, you have all the information, data and resources on <A HREF="http://www.machinaryinfos.cn/" REL="nofollow">Machinery Infos</A>, available at your fingertips. Browse through this site and you'll find all you need here.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22031270.post-89078839161575025852008-07-25T21:57:00.000+10:002008-07-25T21:57:00.000+10:00"The bureaucratic machinery to work all this out w..."The bureaucratic machinery to work all this out would be nightmarish."<BR/>Not for the bureaucratically minded exponents it won't.<BR/><BR/>observaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22031270.post-2254202742096814182008-07-22T11:28:00.000+10:002008-07-22T11:28:00.000+10:00All this money redistributing is heavily based on ...All this money redistributing is heavily based on a wrong assumption, that a natural process of the planetary aging had been initiated with and occurring because of a mere human impact. <BR/><BR/>It is not.<BR/><BR/>As I had already stressed at scientific/ engineering meetings and on Internet pages worldwide, this next financial burden on not-haves could be as much practically useful for a purpose of an environmental protection as apartment blinds postponed a sunrise on the Earth. <BR/><BR/>May one provide an appropriate e-mail address to draw the government minders’ attention to such a realistic opinion? <BR/><BR/>M. Kerjmanmkwrk2https://www.blogger.com/profile/17169288793229337812noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22031270.post-72614488268093157282008-07-21T11:40:00.000+10:002008-07-21T11:40:00.000+10:00Al, that's not true. Garnaut covers this. Major em...Al, that's not true. Garnaut covers this. Major emitters got free permits in Europe and put up their prices anyway. If you give an emitter a permit worth $100 then their choice is to not produce and sell the permit for $100, or use it by making things that emit carbon. If they choose to do that, they've got make at least $100 over and above what they would have made pre-permits, which implies they will put up their prices.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22031270.post-84939834023161109942008-07-21T11:15:00.000+10:002008-07-21T11:15:00.000+10:00Surely if major emitters receive free permits, the...Surely if major emitters receive free permits, they have no incentive to raise the price of their products in a way which would hurt demand - therefore leading to no change in consumption.<BR/><BR/>AlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22031270.post-34211213746557530422008-07-19T16:09:00.000+10:002008-07-19T16:09:00.000+10:00Good piece, Harry. Thanks. The only thing I'd li...Good piece, Harry. Thanks. The only thing I'd like to hear you comment more on is what you think the carbon price should be. (The govt has been quoting an inflation effect of .9% which implies a price of $20)TimDunlophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06733623340418231323noreply@blogger.com