Wednesday, August 01, 2007

Australia's descent into global ignominy

The Age has commissioned an op-ed by Urs Walterlin, ‘Scaring off the World’, that discusses our nation’s move toward becoming a fascist, totalitarian state that destroys the environment and which invites international hatred and contempt. The Age outdoes itself today with its more than usually stupid commitment to national self-hatred.

According to Mr Walterlin ‘Other countries are not blind to Australia's many faults, ranging from politics to the environment’. The Haneef case, David Hicks, Tampa, our treatment of aboriginals and our environmental vandalism have, it seems, damaged Australia's reputation all over the world.

'There are, of course, many other issues that have over the years grabbed the attention of overseas readers: Australia's seemingly blind support of the US, its treatment of David Hicks and the introduction of draconian anti-terrorism legislation that has brought one of the highest levels of loss of individual rights presently observed in a Western country. And then there is the shameful plight and treatment of indigenous Australians that still has the capacity to shock audiences around the globe.'
Finally, our international reputation suffers too because of the way we trash the environment:

'It will simply not be possible for a country, on the one hand, to market itself as a 'clean and green' destination, and on the other hand to have the highest per capita pollution in the world. It will be unacceptable to clear fell-native forests and wastefully use other resources simply because they are cheap and abundant. In the end, only real action will convince the world, not taxpayer-funded PR coups. It will not be enough to send satellites over Asian rainforests and change to "green" light bulbs. This country will have to do better - much better - or the environment could become Australia's next 'Tampa'.'
What really foolish exaggeration this is.

Haneef was justly dealt with by our legal system and our Immigration Minister and, despite serious concerns about his criminal associations, was home in India in under 4 weeks. The Times of India congratulated Australia for the speed with which it dealt with this issue. David Hicks is a convicted terrorist who took up arms against his country. He will be out of jail by Xmas. The Tampa issue was an attempt by our Prime Minister to stop queue jumping and illegal migration. Australia has, per capita, one of the most active immigration policies in the world with 144,000 coming here in 2006/07 and 13,000 refugee and humanitarian immigrants. These intakes are much more generous than most countries and much larger than occurred when Labor was in power in Australia.

Australia has problems with its indigenous communities as do the US, Canada and Asian countries like Malaysia. These are intractable problems that have not responded to huge levels of government spending but which are being addressed. We do have an active greenhouse gas policy and controls on emissions will be made. Our environmental record generally is quite good because we are a rich prosperous community that can afford to spend much on the environment.

The Age is in the business of selling newspapers. Why is there a national market for this type of deceit and self-hatred? How could anyone believe such nonsense. If Australia is such an ugly country in the eyes of the international community why do so many skilled and unskilled migrants seek to live here? Why are international tourism levels so high? Why is it that as an Australian citizen I feel happy and anything but someone who is suffering?


Mark Richardson said...

What's really disturbing about this mindset is that it will never be placated. It wouldn't matter if Australia took in a million refugees, apologised for its existence in Parliament at 3.00pm every Tuesday, or sent every schoolchild to Brazil to plant rainforest trees. The self-mortification would only intensify and it would invite even more one-sided, hypocritical criticism from abroad.

Anonymous said...

Actually, my feeling is that the average person overseas is blind to most of the things Australia does, as Australians would be to the type of things any small relatively irrelevant country does. Most of the bad publicitiy is thanks to idiot tourism in Bali and other such destinations and it therefore tends to be rather regional.
You can even see this from the death-to-country X crowd. The US always gets a mention, as does the UK, but Australia is often forgotten, despite its involvement in stupid wars.

hc said...

I agree with both these comments.

Yes Conrad when I have visited Europe or the US there is virtually no interest in Australia. This guy is making suggestions that are false.

But I am mainly interested in the attempts to induce self-hatred here. We care a thoroughly wicked nation of human rights creeps cand environmental vandals. That is a totally false picture of modern Australia but a picture the Australian left promote.

I agree Mark that vwe will not change this self-mortification with changed policies.

Anonymous said...

First, my experience is consistent with Conrad and Harry's view that the rest of the world (outside activist networks etc) cares little about what we do.

Second, why write and publish this stuff? A few points:

1. there is probably more agreement among people about what they don't like about the current government than about what they like about alternatives.

2. An alternative to a negative piece is a positive piece about a specific alternative e.g. Rudd, the Greens or specific policies. However, different readers are more likely to disagree on this. So The Age appeals to more of its group of readers by publishing stuff many tend to agree on (the "problems") than stuff they disagree on (the "solutions").

3. It is probably harder to pretend a positive piece on Rudd, Brown, policies etc is a piece of "analysis" than reciting the criticism.

4. The international stuff appeals (flatters?) this audience too.

Anonymous (1)

Anonymous said...

Obviously things have changed so much in 2 years when the Howard Govt came to power

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
hc said...

Garry, I am not into blanket denunciations of Islam or, indeed, of the political left. I'd be isolated if I did as some of my best friends are Muslim and, in fact, most of my friends (deluded fools they may be) are on the left of politics. We argue politics and religion all the time!

I agree with most of your comments but some of the things you said made me uneasy. I can't partially edit so I deleted your post. Sorry.